[AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text
version below transcribed directly from audio]
First a parliamentary inquiry about -- these are the continuing
rules of the Senate that have been in existence previous to this time
and have carried over into this session, is that correct?
Presiding Officer: The senator is correct.
Senator Rubio: And the reason I ask that, Mr.
President, is the following: Look, I think we all feel very passionate
about the issues before us. I have not been here as long as Senator
Leahy, whose service here is quite distinguished and a long period of
time, and I truly do understand the passions people bring to this body.
Iíd feel to think -- I'd like to think that I too am passionate about the issues before us
and I think this is an important moment.
Itís late. I doubt very many people are
paying attention. I wish they would though because I think what's a
question here is perhaps one of the very reasons why I ran for this body to begin
with. And maybe itís because of my background and where I'm surrounded
by people that have lost freedoms in places where they're not allowed
to speak. One of the great traditions of our nation is the ability to
come forward and have debates. But the founders and the framers and
those who established this institution and guided it for over two
centuries understood that that debate was impossible if in fact matters
became of a personal nature.
And let me begin by saying that I donít
believe that that was necessarily the intention here, although that was
perhaps the way it turned out. But I think itís important for us to
understand why that matters so much.
I want people to think about our politics
here today in America because I'm telling you guys I donít know of a
single nation in the history of the world that's been able to solve
its problems when half the people in a country absolutely hate the other
half of people in that country. This is the most important country in
the world. And this body cannot function if people are offending one
another, and thatís why those rules are in place.
I was not here when Secretary Clinton was
nominated as a member of this body at the time. But I can tell you that I am
just barely old enough to know that some very nasty things have been
written and said about Secretary Clinton. And I think the Senate should
be very proud that during her nomination to be Secretary of State,
despite the fact that I imagine many people were not excited about the
fact that she would be Secretary of State, to my recollection, and
perhaps Iím incorrect, not a single one of those horrible things that
have been written or said about her, some of which actually did accuse her
of wrongdoing, were ever uttered on the floor of the Senate.
I happen to remember in 2004 when
-- when then-Senator Kerry ran for President. Some pretty strong things were
written and said about him. I was here for that vote when he was nominated
and confirmed to be Secretary of State. And I donít recall a single
statement being written into the record about the things that had been
said about him.
And I want everybody to understand at the
end of the night, this is not a partisan issue. It really is not. I can
tell you this with full confidence: If one of my colleagues on this side
of the aisle had done that, I would -- I would like to think that I would have been
one of the people objecting -- and here's why.
Turn on the news and watch these
parliaments around the world where people throw chairs at each other,
and punches, and ask yourself how does that make you feel about those
countries? Doesn't give you a lot of confidence about those
countries. Now Iím not arguing that we're anywhere near that here
tonight, but we're flirting with it. We're flirting with it in this body
and we are flirting with it in this country. We have become a society
incapable of having debates anymore.
In this country, if you watch the big
policy debates that are going on in America, no one ever stops to say,
ďI think you're wrong, I understand your point of view -- I get it. You
have some valid points, but let me tell you why I think my view is
better.Ē I don't hear that anymore. Hereís what I hear, almost
automatically -- and let me be fair, from both sides of these debates.
Immediately, immediately, as soon as you offer an idea, the other side
jumps and says, ďThe reason why you say that is because you
don't care about poor people." "Because you only care about rich people."
Because you're this, or youíre that or youíre the other. And I'm just
telling you guys, we have -- we are reaching a point in this Republic where we're
not going to be able to solve the simplest of issues because everyone is
putting themselves in a corner where everyone hates everybody.
Now I donít pretend to say that I have -- am not
myself from time to time in heated debates outside of this forum; been
guilty of perhaps of hyperbole, and for those -- I'm not proud of. But I
gotta tell you I think whatís at stake here tonight, and as we debate
moving forward, is not simply some rule but the ability of the most
important nation on earth to debate in a productive and respectful way
the pressing issues before us. And I just hope we understand that
because I have tremendous respect for the other chamber and I understand
that it was designed to be different.
But one of the reasons why I chose to run
for the Senate, and quite frankly to run for reelection, is because I
believe that I serve with 99 other men and women who deeply love their
country, who have different points of view, who represent men and women
who have different views from the men and women that I may represent on a
given issue, and who are here to advocate for their points of view -- and
never impugning their motives.
One of the things I take great pride in --
and I tell this to people all the time -- is the one thing you learn about
the Senate is whether you agree with them or not, you understand why
every single one of those other 99 people are here -- because they're
intelligent people; they're smart people; they're hardworking people;
they believe in what they're saying, and they...articulate it in a very
passionate and effective way. And I understand when I see my colleagues
stand up and say something I donít agree with, I try to tell myself,
ďLook I donít understand why they stand for that but I know why they are
doing it; because they represent people who believe that.Ē
And I am so grateful that God has allowed
me to be born and to live and to raise my family in a -- in a nation where
people with such different points of view are able to debate those
things in a way that doesnít lead to war, that doesnít lead to
overthrows, that doesnít lead to violence.
And you may take that for
granted. Iím telling you that right now, all around the world tonight,
there are people that if they stood up here and said the things that we
say about the -- the President or others in authority, you go to jail.
not saying thatís where we are headed as a nation. Iím just saying donít
ever take that for granted.
And the lynchpin of that is this
institution. The lynchpin of that debate is the ability of this
institution, through unlimited debate and the decorum necessary for that
debate, to be able to conduct itself in that manner.
And so, I know that tonight is probably a
made-for-TV moment for some people. This has nothing to do with
censoring the words of some of the great heroes. I have extraordinary
admiration for the men and women who led the civil rights effort in this
country. And I am self-conscious enough...or understanding to know that many
of the things that have been possible for so many people in this
country in the 21st century were made possible by the sacrifices and
the work of those in that movement that came before us.
This has to do
with the fundamental reality -- and that is that this body cannot carry out its
work if it is not able to conduct debates in a way that is respectful of
one another, especially those of us who are in this chamber together.
And I also understand this: that if the Senate ceases to work, if we
reach a point where this institution, given everything else that's
going on in politics today, where you are basically allowed to say just
about anything. For I have seen over the last year and half things said
about people, about issues, about institutions in our republic, that I
never thought I would see -- ever.
If we lose this bodyís ability to conduct
debate in a dignified manner, and I mean this with no disrespect towards
anyone else -- I donít believe anyone else came on this floor here
tonight saying, ďI'm going to be disrespectful on purpose and...turn this
into a circus.Ē But I'm just telling you that if this body loses the
ability to have those sorts of debate, then where in this country is
that going to happen? What other forum in this nation is that going to
And so, I would just hope everybody
would stop and think about that. I know I've only been here six years
so I donít have a deep reservoir of Senate history to rely on. But I
know this: If this body is incapable of having those debates, there will
be no place in this country where those debates can occur. And I -- I think every
single one of us, to our great shame, will live to regret it.
Mr. President, I yield