Boris Johnson Address to the Nation on New COVID-19 Restrictions delivered 31 October 2020, London, England
[AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio] Good evening and apologies for disturbing your Saturday evening with more news of COVID and I can assure you I wouldn’t do it unless it was absolutely necessary. But first I'm going to hand over to Chris and then to Patrick who will present the latest data. [Verbal remarks of Professor Whitty and Sir Patrick Valence not included in this transcript] Oh, thank -- thank you very much Patrick, and thanks Chris. Look, I'm afraid no responsible Prime Minister can ignore the message of those figures. And when I told you two weeks ago that we were pursuing a local and a regional approach to tackling this virus, I believed then and I still believe passionately that was the right thing to do -- because we know the cost of these restrictions, the damage they do, the impact on jobs, and on livelihoods, and on people’s mental health. No one wants to be imposing these kinds of measures anywhere. And we didn’t want to be shutting businesses, pubs, restaurants in one part of the country, where incidence was -- was very low, when the vast bulk of the infections were taking place elsewhere. And our hope was that by strong local action, strong local leadership, we could get the rates of infection down where the disease was surging, and address the problem thereby across the whole country. I want to thank the millions of people who've been putting up with these restrictions in their areas for so long. I want to thank local leaders who've -- who've stepped up and local communities. Because as you can see from some of those charts, the -- the R [Reproduction Number]1,2 has been kept lower than it would otherwise have been, and there are signs that your work has been paying off. And we will continue, as far as we possibly can, to adopt a pragmatic and a local approach in the months ahead. But as we’ve also seen from those charts, we’ve got to be humble in the face of nature. And in this country, alas, as across much of Europe, the virus is spreading even faster than the reasonable worst case scenario of our scientific advisers -- whose models, as you’ve just seen, now suggest that unless we act we could see deaths in this country running at several thousand a day, a peak of mortality, alas, bigger than the one we saw in April. And as you've just seen, even in the South West, where incidence was so low, and still is so low, it's now clear though that the current projections mean that hospitals in the South West will run out of capacity in just a matter of weeks unless we act. Let me explain why the overrunning of the NHS [National Health Service] would be a medical and a moral disaster beyond the raw loss of life -- because the huge exponential growth in the number of patients -- by no means all of them elderly, by the way -- would mean that doctors and nurses would be forced to choose which patients to treat, who would get oxygen and who wouldn’t, who would live and who would die. And doctors and nurses would be forced to choose between saving COVID patients and non-COVID patients. And the sheer weight of COVID demand would mean depriving tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of non-COVID patients of the care they need. And it's -- it's crucial to grasp this that the general threat to public health comes not from focusing too much on COVID, but from not focusing enough, from failing to get it under control. And if we let the...lines on those graphs grow in the -- the way that they could and in the way that they’re projected to grow, then the risk is that for the first time in our lives, the NHS will not be there for us and for our families. And even if I could now double capacity overnight -- and obviously I'm proud that we have massively increased capacity; we do have the Nightingales -- we’ve got 13,000 more nurses now than last year; we've got many more doctors -- but it still would not be enough, because the virus is doubling faster than we can conceivably add capacity. And so now is the time to take action because there is no alternative. And from Thursday [November 5th] until the start of December, you must stay at home. You may only leave home for specific reasons, including:
- for education; I’m afraid non-essential shops, leisure, and entertainment venues will all be closed -- though click and collect services can continue and essential shops will remain open, so there's no need to stock up. Pubs, bars, restaurants must close except for takeaway and delivery services. Workplaces should stay open where people can’t work from home -- for example in -- in the construction and manufacturing sectors. Single adult households can still form exclusive support bubbles with one other household, and children will still be able to move between homes if their parents are separated. If you're clinically vulnerable, or over the age of 60, you should be especially careful to follow the rules and minimize your contacts with others. I know how tough shielding was, and we will not ask people to shield again -- again in the same way. But we are asking those who are clinically extremely vulnerable to minimize their contact with others, and not to go to work if they are unable to work from home. I am under no illusions about how difficult this will be for businesses which have already had to endure such hardship this year. And I am truly, truly sorry for that. And that's why we are going to extend the furlough system through November. The furlough scheme was a success in the spring. It supported people and businesses in a critical time. We will not end it. We will extend furlough until December. And there will be some differences compared to March. These measures above all will be time-limited, starting Thursday the 5th of November. They will end on Wednesday the 2nd of December, when we'll seek to ease restrictions, going back into the tiered system on a local and a regional basis according to the latest data and trends. Christmas is going to be different this year, perhaps very different, but it's my sincere hope and belief that by taking tough action now, we can allow families across the country to be together.
My priority, our priority, remains keeping people in education
-- so childcare,
early years settings, schools, colleges, and universities will all remain open.
Our senior clinicians still advise that school is the best place for children to
be.
We cannot let this virus damage our children’s futures even more than it has
already. And I urge parents to continue taking their children to school and I am
extremely grateful to teachers across the country for their dedication in
enabling schools to remain open. I'm now going to go to questions from the public and from the media.
[Q&A with the media not included in this transcript] 1 "The average number of secondary infections produced by a single infected person." [Source: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-r-number-in-the-uk#contents] 2 "The epidemiological definition of R0 is the average number of secondary cases produced by one infected individual introduced into a population of susceptible individuals, where an infected individual has acquired the disease, and susceptible individuals are healthy but can acquire the disease." [Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002118/]
Original Text and Slides Source:
gov.uk
Page Updated: 11/3/20 U.S. Copyright Status: Text = Used in compliance with the Crown Copyright/OGL terms found here. Original text lightly modified to match the speaker's verbal delivery. |
|
© Copyright 2001-Present. |